UK NEWS – Sir Alex Ferguson, the iconic former manager of Manchester United, has faced a double blow following controversial decisions made by INEOS owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe. In a significant reshuffle aimed at revitalizing the club, Ratcliffe has scrapped Ferguson’s longstanding role as a global ambassador, a position the legendary Scotsman has held since his retirement from management, earning around £2 million annually. This change has sparked discussions among fans and football pundits alike, as it marks a shift in the club’s culture and respect for its historical figures.
The axing of Ferguson’s ambassadorial role was reportedly communicated in a cordial meeting with Ratcliffe, emphasizing that while Ferguson is still welcome at the club, his influence has notably diminished. This move aligns with Ratcliffe’s broader strategy to bring Manchester United back to prominence, both on and off the pitch. However, the situation took a turn for the worse for Ferguson, as reports surfaced indicating that he, along with other board members, has been banned from entering the team’s dressing room after matches, a long-standing tradition that dates back to the era of Sir Matt Busby.
This decision is particularly striking given Ferguson’s historical connection to the dressing room, where he would often share insights and foster camaraderie among players. Although Ferguson has not frequently availed himself of this tradition in recent years, it has raised eyebrows among fans and former players alike. The absence of such a revered figure from the post-match environment reflects a significant cultural shift within the club, which has many supporters feeling uneasy.
Reactions from former players have been swift and critical. Eric Cantona, a legend in his own right, expressed outrage at the perceived disrespect shown to Ferguson. In a passionate social media post, Cantona asserted that Ferguson should have the freedom to act as he pleases at Manchester United, declaring it “scandalous” that the club would sideline its most successful manager. He even made a bold statement about the lasting influence Ferguson holds, implying that his legacy should remain unchallenged.
Similarly, ex-United defender Rio Ferdinand voiced his concerns on social media, suggesting that if someone as esteemed as Ferguson can be marginalized, then no one at the club is truly safe from similar treatment. Ferdinand’s comments reflect a growing sentiment among supporters that the club’s new direction under Ratcliffe could signal a broader shift in how legends are treated within the organization.
Despite these setbacks, Ferguson is still expected to be seen at Old Trafford during match days, as he has been a regular fixture since stepping down from management. However, his recent absence from significant games has raised eyebrows; he notably skipped a Europa League draw against Porto in favor of attending a match featuring Rangers. His decision to support the Scottish side instead of his own club has not gone unnoticed and may speak volumes about his current sentiments towards Manchester United’s management.
The implications of these decisions are far-reaching, as they could reshape the culture and ethos of Manchester United. As Sir Jim Ratcliffe attempts to implement his vision for the club, the reaction from fans and former players serves as a reminder of the deep-rooted respect and admiration held for Sir Alex Ferguson. The club stands at a crossroads, navigating the delicate balance between modern management strategies and honoring its rich history and traditions. The upcoming months will reveal how these changes impact Manchester United both on and off the field, as fans continue to rally around their storied past while seeking a brighter future.
